Just North of Something Important

Rachel: "People on the Internet can get angry about anything."

About me (contact info and bio)

Jan 19
themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.


No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:
Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.
So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.
What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.

No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:

  • Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
  • Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
  • Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.

So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.

What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.


  1. designerdogs1 reblogged this from urlesque
  2. yorkiepoo1 reblogged this from urlesque
  3. morkie1 reblogged this from urlesque
  4. maltipoo1 reblogged this from urlesque
  5. goldendoodle1 reblogged this from urlesque
  6. labradoodle1 reblogged this from urlesque
  7. hire-a-private-investigator reblogged this from newsweek
  8. sementara-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  9. best-law-firm-in-toronto reblogged this from newsweek
  10. debt---consolidation reblogged this from newsweek
  11. debt-consolidation--loans reblogged this from newsweek
  12. logo-designer-melbourne reblogged this from newsweek
  13. electrician-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  14. supplements-2 reblogged this from newsweek
  15. buyer-review reblogged this from newsweek
  16. iphone-and-android-poker-apps reblogged this from newsweek
  17. desktop--wallpapers reblogged this from newsweek
  18. nutrisystem-reviews reblogged this from urlesque
  19. josh-2 reblogged this from newsweek
  20. ppi---claims reblogged this from newsweek
  21. ppi---claims reblogged this from newsweek
  22. missold-ppi reblogged this from newsweek
  23. massage--chair-reviews reblogged this from newsweek
  24. chat-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  25. managed-file-transfer reblogged this from newsweek
  26. cooking----games reblogged this from newsweek
  27. accountan-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  28. chris-beatty reblogged this from newsweek
  29. tt-races reblogged this from newsweek
  30. breast--augmentation reblogged this from newsweek
  31. cocuklar-icin-ingilizce reblogged this from newsweek
  32. benefits-of-flaxseed reblogged this from newsweek
  33. oro25 reblogged this from newsweek
  34. debt--consolidation reblogged this from newsweek
  35. menswear-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  36. big--booty reblogged this from newsweek
  37. online-forex--trading reblogged this from newsweek
  38. turnanzuege reblogged this from newsweek
  39. turnanzug reblogged this from newsweek
  40. voltigieranzug reblogged this from newsweek
  41. new-wales-rugby-shirt reblogged this from newsweek
  42. free-antivirus-download reblogged this from newsweek
  43. fastest--way-to-lose-weight reblogged this from newsweek
  44. website--hosting reblogged this from newsweek
  45. daniel-kilian reblogged this from newsweek
  46. seo-3 reblogged this from newsweek
  47. m17x-coupon reblogged this from newsweek
  48. learn--to-speak-spanish reblogged this from newsweek
  49. makeup-artist-philippines reblogged this from newsweek